Journal: Journal of Biomedical Science
Article Title: Screening strategy to identify Cas9 variants with higher HDR activity based on diphtheria toxin
doi: 10.1186/s12929-025-01197-9
Figure Lengend Snippet: The activity of the top three obtained mutants (#13, #24, and #27 clones) compared with that of wild-type Cas9. The Cas9 gene was transfected with an episomal vector (pEBMulti. Hyg) via lipofection. Plasmid DNA coding sgRNA and template ssODN, which knock in 12 bases by removing 3 bases from the original sequence, were transfected via electroporation after 3 days of selection with hygromycin B. Editing efficiencies were analyzed via Sanger sequencing and ICE software. The red bar graphs show the results for wild-type Cas9. The green bar graphs show the results for clone #13. The blue bar graphs show the results for clone #24. The purple bar graphs show the results for clone #27. A The ratio of HDR-mediated target knock-in at the AAVS1, EMX1, and VEGFA target sites in HEK293 cells. B The ratio of target mutations at the AAVS1, EMX1, and VEGFA target sites in HEK293 cells. C The ratio of target knock-in per target mutation at the AAVS1, EMX1, and VEGFA target sites in HEK293 cells. All the samples except for the AAVS1 target Cas9 sample were performed in four replicates. One trial of AAVS1 targeting Cas9 could not be performed because of sample loss, but three replicates of AAVS1 targeting Cas9 were performed. The p values in the figures are the p values obtained by performing a Tukey test when the significance level was set at 5%. The raw data sets of each trial are shown in Supplementary Table 3
Article Snippet: Purification of His-tagged Cas9 proteins was performed via the His-Spin Protein Miniprep Kit (Zymo Research) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Techniques: Activity Assay, Clone Assay, Transfection, Plasmid Preparation, Knock-In, Sequencing, Electroporation, Selection, Software, Mutagenesis